Jump to navigation

Sudan

Egypt-backed peace talks make slow progress

Rival factions met in Cairo for reconciliation discussions but deep divisions limited the prospects for meaningful progress

The latest international attempts – this time by Egypt – to broker peace talks between the two sides in the civil war are already struggling. Cairo, which backs the Sudan Armed Forces has been trying to make progress in close-door discussions with the United Arab Emirates, which backs the Rapid Support Forces militia which is widely accused of massacring women and children in Darfur. The UAE is also of the biggest foreign investors in Egypt.

During the conference the Democratic Bloc, which is aligned with the army, refused to hold joint sessions with the Tagadum faction, which represents the Sudanese Coordination of Civil Democratic Forces, which it accuses of sympathising with the RSF  (AC Vol 65 No 3, Why Tagadum could be a turning point). Neither the SAF nor the RSF attended the meetings in Cairo.

Tagadum is headed by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, who urged both sides to ‘be patient and to build on anything positive that comes out of it’.

He also played up the prospects of a meeting between Sudan’s army leader, General Abdel Fattah al Burhan, and RSF commander Gen Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo ‘Hemeti’ in the coming weeks.

The meeting, which was endorsed by the African Union’s Peace and Security Council last week, was supposed to help the parties take the first steps towards a formal process that would be mediated by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni.

Instead, the two factions agreed only to form a small subcommittee to come up with a final communique calling for an end to the war, which three Democratic Bloc leaders –  Finance Minister Jibril Ibrahim, Darfur governor Minni Minnawi and Sovereign Council deputy Malik Agar did not sign.

A series of previous attempts by the international community to mediate a ceasefire to the war which started in April 2023, have been unsuccessful. This is in part because many neighbouring countries are perceived to have backed a side in the conflict (Dispatches 27/3/24, IGAD returns to Sudan negotiations with a peace envoy).



Related Articles

Why Tagadum could be a turning point

A civilian initiative to bring the warring factions to the negotiating table may be the last defence against a war that would shatter the country

Two opportunities to broker a ceasefire in Sudan's ruinous civil war have been arbitrarily waived aside in the new year by the warring generals' cohorts, raising concerns of...


DISPATCHES

IGAD returns to Sudan negotiations with a peace envoy

The authority said Korbandy would provide 'pivotal good offices' in seeking to get Burhan and Hemeti to the negotiating table

The Horn of Africa's Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) named South Sudanese lawyer Lawrence Korbandy as Special Envoy for Sudan on Tuesday.

READ FOR FREE

Gulf States power play scuppers peace bid

A peace conference on Sudan declined to hold the Middle Eastern sponsors of the war to account. Now the conflict is spreading to Chad

If anyone questioned that the Gulf States United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, with their less pecunious partner Egypt, hold a veto on Sudan policy, the conference in...


Southern discomfort

The new Government of Southern Sudan has to reconcile the rivalries of its many peoples, exacerbated for decades by Khartoum regimes. The mandatory disarmament is proving tricky –...


Joy in the South, silence in the North

The peace deal shores up the regime but raises doubts about the eventual plan for Southern independence

At long last, Sudan's Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) has been signed, in Kenya's National Stadium on 9 January. Yet the participants have very different aims: the regime wants...