Jump to navigation

Sudan

Arab proxy war in Sudan laid bare as London summit fails

The gulf between Saudi Arabia’s and the United Arab Emirates’ positions prevented the formation of a contact group

Disagreement among the regional sponsors of the main combatants in Sudan’s civil war, the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and Rapid Support Forces (RSF), led to the collapse of a summit in London on 15 April aimed at boosting efforts to end the two-year-old conflict.

British diplomats pushed the idea of creating a contact group. The theory was that Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates could use the group to pressure their proxies in the war. That meant the SAF in the case of Egypt and Saudi Arabia; and the RSF for the UAE. Yet the Gulf states refused to sign a joint communique after a day of talks London.

In the absence of representatives from the SAF or RSF, or, indeed, any of Sudan’s civilian leaders, British officials hosting the ministerial summit on the second anniversary of the civil war’s start had hoped to focus on the Middle East states who were providing funding and weapons to the warring factions.

The failure left the UK and its co-hosts, the European Union and African Union, to promise to support ‘efforts to find a peaceful solution and reject all activities, including external interference, that heighten tensions or that prolong or enable fighting’.

The statement also called for a solution that did not lead to Sudan’s partition after RSF leader General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo aka Hemeti announced on Tuesday the establishment of the Government of Peace and Unity, a parallel government (AC Vol 66 No 4, The generals choose partition over peace).

The meeting ended up as little more than a pledging summit for humanitarian aid, and one which ended with meagre new commitments. In February, the United Nations estimated that around US$6 billion would be needed in 2025 to support around 20 million people in Sudan or neighbouring countries who have been displaced or need humanitarian aid. The London summit, however, generated around $750m in new commitments from the UK and the EU (AC Vol 66 No 8, Cash, platitudes but no peace).



Related Articles

The generals choose partition over peace

General Burhan’s SAF has won back the eastern and central lands taken by the RSF but a deadly stalemate persists

The battle for control of Khartoum is raging. The Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) led by General Abdel Fattah al Burhan is fighting for control of what is left...


Cash, platitudes but no peace

About US$750 million in fresh humanitarian aid – €522m ($592m) from the European Union and £120m ($158m) from the United Kingdom – was on the table along with...


Swiss dead-end prompts policy rethink

General Burhan’s refusal to attend talks may prompt new negotiating strategy benefiting Hemeti’s fighters

One of the ‘seeds of hope’ identified by United States envoy Tom Perriello as the Sudan peace talks in Switzerland broke up on 23 August was an accord...


The bombing of Kiir Adem

Khartoum’s deadly bombardment of a border village shows growing desperation at the prospects of Southern succession next year

Three weeks before the referendum on Southern Sudan, it is clear that the scheduled simultaneous vote on the Abyei area’s future will not go ahead on 9 January....


Marching to Juba

On the ground, the Sudan People's Liberation Army looks competent and confident of taking Juba. Its rout of government forces is unparallelled since the 1991 split. Under the...