Jump to navigation

Financing a debt to nature

A group of countries is working on a joint conservation plan to raise $2 billion to protect coral reefs, mangroves and fish stocks in the Indian Ocean

A group of African nations is working on what could become the world’s first joint ‘debt-for-nature’ swap and the latest innovative solution on debt reduction and climate financing. The countries supporting the ‘Great Blue Wall’ conservation plan to protect coral reefs on the Indian Ocean include Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania and the Comoros, though only a handful are understood to be involved in the debt swap proposal.

The project is working to raise over US$2 billion to protect a coral-rich region of the Indian Ocean, according to Thomas Sberna of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.

Backed by the United States and British governments, it aims to protect and restore two million hectares of ocean ecosystems by 2030, replenishing coral reefs, mangroves and fish stocks.

Sberna has mooted a fund composed of $500m of concessional funding and $1.5bn of bond swap money.

The idea of offering debt alleviation in exchange for environmental protection and conservation has emerged at successive COP climate summits and has the support of many western governments and the likes of Pascal Lamy, the former Director-General of the World Trade Organization, who says that ‘nature’s contribution to decarbonisation can be priced’.

Barbados and the Galápagos Islands have already struck agreements offering debt alleviation in exchange for protecting coral reefs.

Debt-for-nature swaps and the Global Green Bond Initiative are among the latest attempts by leaders to link climate finance and debt alleviation for the countries most vulnerable to climate change.

They are more likely to find favour among civil society groups and economists than carbon credit markets, such as the African Carbon Markets Initiative which was launched at Egypt’s COP27 summit in November 2022 and has been pushed by some African leaders as a way to offset emissions through activities such as planting trees or investing in renewable energy projects.

Many view such offset schemes as a distraction with dubious environmental credentials (AC Vol 64 No 18, Nairobi vies for green capital status).



Related Articles

Nairobi vies for green capital status

William Ruto advances his own, and Kenya's interests, but fails to pull in much climate finance from industrial economies

Having spent much of the first year of his presidency staking out the ground as one of Africa's leading voices on climate change and energy policy, Kenya's William...


Big projects and bottlenecks

Natural resources are still the main draw for investors but new markets for India’s food, services and consumer goods beckon the big companies

The Indian National Congress and Manmohan Singh will try to hang on until general elections are called, in mid-2014 at the latest. With corruption fuelling the public’s anger,...


More boots on the ground

The United States Department of Defence is considering assigning a permanent army to its Africa military command, Africom. At present, Africom has to source all the troops it...


Give without counting

The Chinese government is slowly changing its aid reporting statistics so that its programmes can be compared to those of other donors

It began with ‘China is a developing country’ and ended by shedding some – but not much – light on Beijing’s global aid programmes. In April, China’s State...


Previewing FOCAC V

FOCAC will review China’s successes in Africa, as well as its problems, but Beijing’s policy of non-interference remains non-negotiable

Beijing hosts the Fifth Ministerial Conference of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) on 19-20 July, where China will make a raft of new promises to its African...