Jump to navigation

Rubio deals hammer blow to US aid

An executive order from President imposes a 90-day freeze on most foreign funding – except military aid

Within hours of entering the White House, President Donald Trump issued an executive order for a three-month freeze on all foreign aid. This move seemed certain to result in major cuts to the US$68 billion annual US foreign aid budget and the $8bn allocated by the Biden administration in aid for sub-Saharan Africa in 2024.

However, officials say privately that the directive issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, interpreting Trump’s order, is far more radical than they had anticipated (AC Vol 66 No 2, America first but Africa where?).

Rubio issued a ‘stop-work’ memorandum to all US agencies on 24 January and its scope applies both to ongoing and future projects. The only exceptions are military aid to Israel and Egypt, and US contributions to emergency food assistance.

‘No new funds shall be obligated for new awards or extensions of existing awards until each proposed new award or extension has been reviewed and approved,’ says the memo to staff.

Senior diplomats issued the ‘stop-work’ instructions to embassy and local agency staff on 25 January, Africa Confidential has learned.

That may have long-lasting implications for US aid programmes even if most initiatives are unfrozen in April and major job cuts, particularly in US Agency for International Development, are now expected.

Elsewhere, the US withdrawal from the World Health Organization, which leaves a $1.2bn budget hole, is expected to have an immediate impact on the response to the mpox pandemic in central Africa.

While Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials briefed last week that they do not expect their own programmes to be significantly affected, Africa CDC’s Ngashi Ngongo told journalists that the loss of US funding means that ‘it is time for some of the African member states to think the financing of public health’.



Related Articles

America first but Africa where?

Deal-making diplomacy and geopolitical rivalry with China will dominate Washington’s policy in Africa

Many African leaders believe they can do business with new US President Donald Trump despite his previous lack of interest in the continent. A chorus of congratulatory messages...


Not on parade

The planned new military headquarters will stay in Europe because of the widespread hostility to it in Africa

Washington officials had hoped that their new African military headquarters would be (where else?) in Africa. The Africa Command (Africom) would, they said, help the fight against Islamism,...


The influence brokers take a pay cut

Governments and activists in Africa are driving harder bargains with Washington DC’s lobby shops

The latest slew of lobbying contracts in Washington DC are offering cut price services for African clients. It’s not clear why. Some argue that the clients are pushing...


Seoul search in Africa

Despite the global slowdown, South Korea used its Africa summit to strike more deals and expand its diplomatic reach

International financial realities did not deter the 21 African delegations to the second Korea-Africa Economic Cooperation Conference (KOAFEC), held in Seoul on 27-30 October. At the inaugural meeting two years ago,...


Alliances come under heavy fire

Governments across Africa are reviewing ties with Moscow as the international crisis over its Ukraine invasion deepens

Africa is not directly concerned by the Russia-Ukraine war, yet the African Union and a few member states have made their views known loudly, in contrast with their...

READ FOR FREE