Jump to navigation

Carbon row heads to the World Trade Organization

South Africa and India have accused the EU of using environmental issues as a cover for protectionism in its new CBAM

African countries are set to raise formal complaints about the effects of some of the European Union's new laws on environmental protection and carbon at this week's Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Abu Dhabi.

South Africa and India are expected to accuse the EU of using environmental protection as a cover for protectionism in the design of its new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), a carbon levy that will apply to imports of a group of products including steel, cement, iron and aluminium.

The Ministerial Conference – held every two years – is the WTO's highest body.The levy was designed by EU lawmakers as part of the bloc's push towards net zero carbon emissions. The two countries have led the international opposition to CBAM, arguing it could breach the WTO's non-discrimination principle.

The African Climate Foundation has estimated that the levy could result in a 4% drop in Africa's exports to Europe (AC Vol 64 No 13, How Brussels's green tax will hit Africa).

'Any climate justified measures [such as levies] that directly restrict market access by developing countries and LDCs [Less Developed Countries], where research shows the reduction of carbon emissions is minimal, should be avoided,' the African Group at the WTO said in a report last year.

EU officials insist that the phase-out of free allowances for carbon emissions to EU firms means that it is WTO compliant.

Others, meanwhile, are expected to raise concerns about the EU's new law on deforestation which will require companies selling products using commodities such as cocoa, coffee and timber, to prove at all stages of their supply chain that their manufacture did not lead to deforestation. The law will enter into force later this year.

Ethiopia has already indicated that it will ask Brussels for more time to prepare its farmers, particularly in the coffee sector, to comply, amid concerns that the compliance costs could encourage large firms to buy from larger commercial farms rather than smallholder farmers. Brazil, another major coffee producer, accused the EU of failing to consult other countries when drafting the new law.

 



Related Articles

How Brussels's green tax will hit Africa

Europe's carbon levy has become law with African states in line to suffer collateral damage

After two years of debate, the European Parliament has passed a carbon pricing mechanism which will apply to all countries trading with member states of the European Union...


Another trade muddle

The marriage between the EU and the continent’s 48 ACP members will rumble on amid talk of a grandiose free trade pact

Formal talks on the successor to the 2000 Cotonou Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the 79-nation African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) community – which includes 48...


Pandemic prospects

Cases are increasing rapidly but lockdown policies have been easing and there is little public or political appetite to tighten them again

With Covid-19 positive cases doubling in the last two weeks, Africa is expected to notch up its millionth patient in the coming days. 'We are at a pivotal...


Alliances come under heavy fire

Governments across Africa are reviewing ties with Moscow as the international crisis over its Ukraine invasion deepens

Africa is not directly concerned by the Russia-Ukraine war, yet the African Union and a few member states have made their views known loudly, in contrast with their...

READ FOR FREE

New names, same games

The new European Commission fails to match the hype about a relaunch of EU-Africa relations

Jean-Claude Juncker waited until his final State of the Union speech in September 2018 to show any interest in EU-Africa relations, surprising many with the offer of a...