A rebel takeover of the capital would be an irreversible defeat
for UN peacekeeping and British policy
The next few weeks will be critical for Sierra Leoneans and, more widely, for peacekeeping missions across Africa. Much will depend on the defence of Freetown mounted by United Nations' forces, backed by some 3,000 Sierra Leonean government troops and over 800 British troops. If the military band-aid stuck on by the UN and the British government holds and the Revolutionary United Front rebels are driven back, that will clear the way for a drastic restructuring of the UN Mission in Sierra Leone (Unamsil). UN officials, Western and African diplomats will have to accept that the peace accord brokered in Lomé last July has collapsed irretrievably and start to write a new script. Since the current crisis began with the kidnapping of 90 UN peacekeepers on 3 May, it has seemed inevitable that the RUF would attack Freetown. For the RUF, controlling the capital city, devastated by previous assaults, is the political counterpart of its economic and military control of the diamond fields. Given their rout of UN forces up country, RUF commanders may reckon that Freetown remains an easy target. They may be repeating the tactics of their January 1999 assault, in which RUF fighters were secreted in Freetown's suburbs some days prior to the main assault on government buildings.
Washington lobbyists see their market undercut by a new twist
in government policy
The select band of highly-paid lobbyists in Washington is feeling the heat from the United States government's most activist Africa policy for more than a decade. Under previous go...
Competition is fierce in Washington for public relations dollars
from Africa
From their own investigations and from records at the United States Justice Department in Washington, Africa Confidential's correspondents have compiled a list of current and recen...
